Legal Opinion
United Parcel Service, Inc. v. Bureau of Safety & Regulation
Michigan Court of Appeals
Decided January 31, 2008No. Docket 269720PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MARKEY, EJ.
Petitioner United Parcel Service, Inc. (UPS), appeals by leave granted the circuit court’s order affirming administrative rulings upholding two civil citations that alleged UPS violated Mich Admin Code, R 408.13308(1), by failing to assess its aircraft repair facilities located at Lansing and Romulus to determine if hazards necessitating the use of personal protective equipment (PPE) were present. We conclude that the plain text of the rule mandates that an employer “assess the workplace to determine if hazards that necessitate the use of personal protective equip ment are present…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Roberts v. Mecosta County General HospitalMichigan Supreme Court · 2002
- Booth Newspapers, Inc v. University of Michigan Board of RegentsMichigan Supreme Court · 1993
- Catalina Marketing Sales Corp. v. Department of TreasuryMichigan Supreme Court · 2004
- People v. Lanzo Construction Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 2007
- City of Romulus v. Department of Environmental QualityMichigan Court of Appeals · 2004
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Detroit Public Schools v. ConnMichigan Court of Appeals · 2014
- Alvan Motor Freight, Inc. v. Department of TreasuryMichigan Court of Appeals · 2008
- Burise v. City of PontiacMichigan Court of Appeals · 2009
- Superior Hotels, LLC v. MacKinaw TownshipMichigan Court of Appeals · 2009
- Michigan Ass'n of Chiropractors v. Blue Cross Blue ShieldMichigan Court of Appeals · 2013
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.