Bryant v. Kelly
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtWaste, C. J.
The respondents move to dismiss three appeals, to wit, an appeal from an order sustaining a de murrer to the amended complaint, an appeal from an order striking out certain portions of the amended complaint, and an appeal from the judgment entered after demurrer sustained without leave to amend. The respondents move to dismiss the first two appeals upon the ground that the orders therein concerned are not appealable orders. In making this contention, the respondents are correct. (2 Cal. Jur., pp. 156, 157.)
It is urged that the appeal from the judgment should be dismissed, or the judgment…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Jeffords v. YoungCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
- Dahlberg v. DahlbergCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
- Goyhinech v. GoyhinechCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
- Lynch v. CoeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
- Edw. L. Soule Co. v. SevertsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Braren v. Reliable Carpet Works, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1932
- Milstein v. SartainCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
- Shipley v. San Diego Electric Railway Co.California Court of Appeal · 1930
- Confar v. WhelanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
- Pacific Palisades Assn. v. MenningerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.