Legal Opinion

Willie E. Boyd v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided November 12, 2002No. 02-1848PublishedCited by 109 opinions

1Per curiam

Willie Boyd’s petition for panel rehearing having been granted, we return the matter to the District Court with directions to file and then dismiss Mr. Boyd’s motion under Rule 60(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure because it is, on its face, a second or successive 28 U.S.C. § 2255 petition, see Mathenia v. Delo, 99 F.3d 1476, 1480 (8th Cir.1996), cert. denied, Mathenia v. Bowersox, 521 U.S. 1123, 117 S.Ct. 2518, 138 L.Ed.2d 1020 (1997), that we have not previously authorized and do not now authorize, our authorization being a prerequisite under 28 U.S.C. § 2244(b)(3) (2000) to the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Chuck Lee Mathenia v. Paul DeloCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1996

3Cited by109 opinions

  1. United States v. Paul Winestock, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2003
  2. Roy William Harris v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2004
  3. United States v. John Gregory LambrosCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2005
  4. United States v. George Lemark PattonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2002
  5. Desmond Rouse v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2021

104 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API