Legal Opinion
Smith v. Midland Brake, Inc.
District Court, D. Kansas
Decided May 1, 2000No. Civ.A. 94-4165-DESPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
SAFFELS, District Judge.
This matter is before the court on the defendant’s motion for summary judgment (Doc. 109). For the reasons set forth below, the motion for summary judgment is denied in part and granted in part. Summary judgment is granted as to plaintiffs claims based on discriminatory acts occurring prior to July 26, 1992, the effective date of the ADA and denied as to all other claims.
I. BACKGROUND
Plaintiff Robert W. Smith 1 (“Smith”) was employed by defendant Midland Brake, Inc. (“Midland”) from May 1986 until March 1993 in the light assembly department,…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Cleveland v. Policy Management Systems Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1999
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Jody King v. Huntress, Inc.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 2014
- Praseuth v. Newell-Rubbermaid, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 2002
- Rando v. Texaco Refining and Marketing Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 2001