Legal Opinion

Rando v. Texaco Refining and Marketing Inc.

District Court, D. Kansas

Decided August 31, 2001No. 99-4083-DESPublished

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

SAFFELS, District Judge.

This matter is before the court on defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 14) brought pursuant to Rule 56(c) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Plaintiff has filed a response (Doc. 24), and defendants have filed a reply to plaintiffs response (Doc. 27). Plaintiff alleges violations under the Americans with Disabilities Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 12101 et seq. (“ADA”), Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e et seq., and the Civil Rights Act of 1870, 42 U.S.C. § 1981. For the following reasons defendants’ motion is granted.

I.…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  5. United States Postal Service Board of Governors v. AikensSupreme Court of the United States · 1983

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API