Schmidt v. Stearman
Court of Appeals of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
Sarah Heffley, Judge.
Appellant Paul Schmidt sued appel-lee Gary Stearman for conversion, trespass, and the tort of outrage. The trespass and outrage counts were dismissed by directed verdict, and the conversion count went to a jury, which found in favor of Stearman. Schmidt appeals, seeking a new trial on his conversion claim; reversal of the directed verdicts on trespass and outrage; and a ruling that the trial court erred in excluding certain evidence and refusing two profferedjury instructions. We reverse and remand for a new trial on Schmidt’s cause of action for conversion; all other…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Elliott v. HurstSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1991
- McQuillan v. Mercedes-Benz Credit Corp.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1998
- FMC CORPORATION, INC. v. HeltonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2005
- Routh Wrecker Service, Inc. v. WinsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1993
- Hatchell v. WrenSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2005
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Integrated Direct Marketing, LLC v. MayDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2015
- Tri-Eagle Enterprises v. Regions BankCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2010
- Kuelbs v. HillCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2010
- Coombs v. J.B. Hunt Transport, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 2012
- Holman v. FloresCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2018
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.