Legal Opinion

Environmental Defense Fund, Inc. v. Wheelabrator Technologies, Inc., Westchester Resco Company, L.P.

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided April 24, 1991No. 1219, Docket 90-7437PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MESKILL, Circuit Judge:

This is an appeal from a judgment entered in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, Haight, J., on April 16, 1990, granting summary judgment in favor of the defendants Wheelabrator Technologies, Inc. and West-chester Resco Company, L.P. (collectively “Wheelabrator”), and dismissing plaintiff Environmental Defense Fund’s (EDF) complaint with prejudice. Judgment was entered pursuant to Judge Haight’s order of April 9, 1990. Prior to ordering entry of judgment, Judge Haight had issued an opinion dated November 21, 1989, which examined EDF’s…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Environmental Defense Fund, Inc. v. Wheelabrator Technologies Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1989

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Sugarloaf Citizens' Ass'n v. Department of EnvironmentCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1996
  2. Aiello v. Town of BrookhavenDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2001
  3. Environmental Defense Fund, Inc. v. The City of ChicagoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1991
  4. City of Chicago v. Environmental Defense FundSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  5. City of Chicago v. Environmental Defense FundSupreme Court of the United States · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API