Legal Opinion

City of Chicago v. Environmental Defense Fund

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided May 2, 1994No. 92-1639Published

1Opinion of the Court 1

511 U.S. 328 (1994)

CITY OF CHICAGO et al.

v.

ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND et al.

No. 92-1639.

United States Supreme Court.

Argued January 19, 1994.

Decided May 2, 1994.

CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT

2Opinion of the Court · ScaliaScalia, J.

J., and Blackmun, Kennedy, Souter, Thomas, and Ginsburg, JJ., joined. Stevens, J., filed a dissenting opinion, in which O'Connor, J., joined, post, p. 340.

Lawrence Rosenthal argued the cause for petitioners. With him on the briefs were Susan S. Sher, Benna Ruth Solomon, and Mardell Nereim.

Jeffrey P. Minear argued the cause for the United States as amicus curiae…

Also in this document: Opinion of the Court · Scalia; Dissent.

3Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Keene Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  3. John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance v. Harris Trust & Savings BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  4. City of Chicago v. Environmental Defense FundSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  5. Environmental Defense Fund, Inc. v. Wheelabrator Technologies Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1989

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API