Legal Opinion
Al-Menhali v. Marriott International Inc.
District Court, N.D. Ohio
Decided September 4, 2019No. 1:17-cv-01089Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION AHMED AL-MENHALI, et al., ) Case No.: 1:17 CV 1089 ) Plaintiffs ) ) v. ) JUDGE SOLOMON OLIVER, JR. ) MARRIOTT INTERNATIONAL, INC., ) et al., ) ) Defendants ) ORDER Currently pending before the court is Westfield Insurance Company’s (“Westfield”) Motion for Leave to Intervene as a New Party Defendant (“Motion”) pursuant to Rule 24(a), or alternatively Rule 24(b), of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (ECF No. 72.) Plaintiffs, Ahmed Al-Menhali (“Al-Menhali”) and Taghrid Milki (collectively, “Plaintiffs”), oppose…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- United States v. Alisal Water Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- Scotty Grubbs, the Metropolitan Government of Nashville and Davidson County, Proposed Intervenor/appellant v. Stephen H. NorrisCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1989
- Timothy Jansen, Cross-Appellants v. City of Cincinnati v. Tilford Youngblood, Prospective Intervenors, Cross-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990
- Restor-A-Dent Dental Laboratories, Inc. v. Certified Alloy Products, Inc., Unigard Mutual Insurance Company, Intervener-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1984
- Kathy Stupak-Thrall,plaintiffs-Appellees v. Daniel Glickman,defendants, the Wilderness Society, Proposed Intervenors-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2000
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.