Legal Opinion
Capogrosso v. the Supreme Court of New Jersey
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided November 27, 2009No. 08-3816PublishedCited by 432 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
2Per curiam
Pro se appellant Eleanor Capogrosso, an attorney, filed a civil rights action against, inter alia, four New Jersey Superior Court judges, the New Jersey Advisory Committee on Judicial Conduct (“ACJC”), ACJC Disciplinary Counsel Candace Moody, and ACJC Director John Tonelli. Her claims stemmed from alleged judicial misconduct in her state court cases and alleged misconduct on the part of the ACJC, which is charged under the New Jersey Rules of Court with investigating claims of judicial misconduct. Capogrosso appeals from the District Court decision dismissing her 42 U.S.C. § 1988…
3Cases cited11 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Phillips v. County of AlleghenyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2008
- Parratt v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by432 opinions
- Hebbe v. PlilerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- Emil Jutrowski v. Township of RiverdaleCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2018
- Phillip Fantone v. Fred LatiniCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2015
- Thakar v. TanCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2010
- Mikhail v. KahnDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2014
427 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.