Legal Opinion
Muderis v. Hernandez
District Court, D. Nevada
Decided January 5, 2022No. 2:19-cv-01002Unknown
1Opinion
1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 3 MUNJED AL MUDERIS, an individual dba Case No.: 2:19-cv-01002-APG-DJA OSSEOINTEGRATION GROUP OF 4 AUSTRALIA, and OSSEOINTEGRATION ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR INTERNATIONAL PTY LTD., an Australian SUMMARY JUDGMENT 5 limited company, [ECF No. 44] 6 Plaintiffs, 7 v. 8 FRED HERNANDEZ, an individual, and AMPUTEK, INC., a Nevada corporation, 9 Defendants. 10 11 The plaintiffs move for summary judgment on their claims. ECF No. 44. The defendants 12 did not respond. The defendants have offered no evidence to rebut the plaintiffs’ factual 13…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Victoria Zetwick v. County of YoloCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
- MAI Systems Corp. v. Peak Computer, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
- Sonner v. Schwabe N. Am., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
- Southland Sod Farms v. Stover Seed Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.