Legal Opinion
Sonner v. Schwabe N. Am., Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided December 26, 2018No. 17-55261PublishedCited by 310 opinions
1Per curiam
*991Kathleen Sonner filed a consumer class action against the sellers of two Ginkgold nutritional supplements for violations of California's Unfair Competition Law, Cal. Bus. & Prof. Code § 17200, et seq. ("UCL"), the Consumers Legal Remedies Act, Cal. Civ. Code § 1750, et seq. ("CLRA"), and breach of express warranty. Sonner alleges that these products were falsely labeled as capable of improving various cognitive functions when in fact they provided no such benefits. Although she supported her claims with expert opinion and other scientific evidence, the district court granted summary judgment…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Provenz v. MillerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
- In Re Worlds Of Wonder Securities LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
- Southland Sod Farms v. Stover Seed Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by310 opinions
- Californians For Renewable Energy v. Ca PucoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
- Dinkins v. SchinzelDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2019
- Fed. Hous. Fin. Agency, Home Loan Mortg. Corp. v. LN Mgmt. LLCDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2019
- Michael Terpin v. at and T Mobility LLCCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2024
- Sabatini v. Las Vegas Metro. Police Dep'tDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2019
305 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.