Legal Opinion

Granquist v. Randolph

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided December 9, 1996No. 96-854PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DONALD L. Corbin, Justice.

Appellant Elizabeth Granquist appeals the order of the Pope County Circuit Court setting aside a default judgment previously entered on Appellant’s complaint for breach of a separation agreement between her and Appellee Scott John Randolph. For reversal, Appellant contends the order denies her the right to a jury trial on her claim for breach of contract. The court of appeals certified this case to us as one involving the construction of the Arkansas Constitution. Our jurisdiction is pursuant to Ark. Sup. Ct. R. l-2(a)(l), (d)(1). We find no merit to Appellant’s…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Curtis v. LoetherSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Firstbank of Arkansas v. KeelingSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1993
  3. McCue v. McCueSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1946
  4. Colclasure v. Kansas City Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1986
  5. Collie v. CollieSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1967

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Hopper v. GarnerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1997
  2. Minor v. FaillaSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1997
  3. Pilcher v. Suttle Equipment Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2006
  4. Epting v. Precision Paint & Glass, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2003
  5. City of Greenbrier v. RobertsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API