Legal Opinion
Fenton v. Board of Directors
California Court of Appeal
Decided June 7, 1984No. F002607PublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
VAN AUKEN, J. *
The major issue involved in this appeal is whether or not the trial court erred when it ruled that respondent was “residing” within the district under Government Code section 61200. The trial court found that although respondent had been physically residing outside of the district, she was in fact “domiciled” within the district at Big Oak Flat and was therefore “residing” within the district under Government Code section 61200.
For reasons hereinafter stated, we agree with the trial court’s decision and affirm the declaratory relief granted below.
Facts
Facts Regarding the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Ernst v. SearleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
- Smith v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
- Barton v. OwenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
- In Re Marriage of LeffCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
- Ballf v. Public Welfare DepartmentCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Walters v. WeedCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
- Seeley v. SeymourCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987
- Nicolopulos v. City of LawndaleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
- Hoffman-Haag v. Transamerica InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
- Nelson v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.