Legal Opinion

Curtis v. Otter Tail County Board of Adjustment

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided May 8, 1990No. C7-89-1609PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

KALITOWSKI, Judge.

Appellant Gene Curtis applied for a variance from the Otter Tail County Shoreland Management Ordinance. The Otter Tail County Board of Adjustment granted Curtis a limited variance.

Curtis filed a timely notice of appeal to the district court pursuant to Minn.Stat. § 394.27, subd. 9 (1988) which the trial court dismissed for lack of jurisdiction because Curtis failed to serve and file a summons with the notice of appeal. Curtis appeals the dismissal.

FACTS

Gene Curtis applied for a variance from the Otter Tail County Shoreland Management Ordinance and was granted a…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Heinsch v. Lot 27, Block 1 Fob's Beach, Section 21, Township 69, Range 21 (Unorganized Township), St. Louis CountyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
  2. County of Ramsey v. Minnesota Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
  3. Fish Hook Ass'n v. Grover Bros. PartnershipCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1988

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In re Application of Skyline Materials, Ltd.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2013
  2. In re Skyline Materials, Ltd.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2012
  3. Elbert v. TlamCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2013
  4. Schulz v. Town of DuluthCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API