Curtis v. Otter Tail County Board of Adjustment
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
KALITOWSKI, Judge.
Appellant Gene Curtis applied for a variance from the Otter Tail County Shoreland Management Ordinance. The Otter Tail County Board of Adjustment granted Curtis a limited variance.
Curtis filed a timely notice of appeal to the district court pursuant to Minn.Stat. § 394.27, subd. 9 (1988) which the trial court dismissed for lack of jurisdiction because Curtis failed to serve and file a summons with the notice of appeal. Curtis appeals the dismissal.
FACTS
Gene Curtis applied for a variance from the Otter Tail County Shoreland Management Ordinance and was granted a…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Heinsch v. Lot 27, Block 1 Fob's Beach, Section 21, Township 69, Range 21 (Unorganized Township), St. Louis CountyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
- County of Ramsey v. Minnesota Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
- Fish Hook Ass'n v. Grover Bros. PartnershipCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1988
3Cited by4 opinions
- In re Application of Skyline Materials, Ltd.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2013
- In re Skyline Materials, Ltd.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2012
- Elbert v. TlamCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2013
- Schulz v. Town of DuluthCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2019