Legal Opinion

American Cas. Co. of Reading v. SKILSTAF, INC.

District Court, M.D. Alabama

Decided March 18, 2010No. Civil Action 3:08cv333-MHTPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

MYRON H. THOMPSON, District Judge.

Plaintiffs American Casualty Insurance Company of Reading, Pennsylvania, National Fire Insurance Company of Hartford, and Transportation Insurance Company bring this lawsuit against defendants Skilstaf, Inc., and PACA, Inc., asserting claims related to workers’ compensation insurance programs. Jurisdiction is proper under 28 U.S.C. § 1332 (diversity).

This ease is now before the court on the defendants’ motion to dismiss. For the following reasons, the motion will be denied.

I. BACKGROUND

Skilstaf sued Continental Casualty Company in state court…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Colorado River Water Conservation District v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. New Hampshire v. MaineSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
  5. Axa Corporate Solutions, Plaintiff-Appellant/cross-Appellee v. Underwriters Reinsurance Corporation, Defendant-Appellee/cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2003

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Archie v. Covington CountyDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · 2021
  2. Benchmark Insurance Company v. Sustainable Energy Solutions, Inc.District Court, M.D. Alabama · 2019
  3. Heritage Property & Casualty Insurance Company v. HolmesDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API