Legal Opinion
Hanford Downwinders Coalition, Inc. v. Dowdle
District Court, E.D. Washington
Decided December 23, 1993No. CS-93-0245-AAM, CS-93-0290-AAMPublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MeDONALD, District Judge.
On December 9,1993, the Court heard oral argument on the United States’ motions to dismiss the two above-entitled civil actions (CS-93-0245-AAM, Ct.Rec. 8, CS-93-0290AAM, Ct.Rec. 4). Appearing for plaintiffs in the Hanford Downwinders Coalition action was Tom Foulds. Appearing for plaintiffs in the Columbia River United action was Nancy Oreskovich. Appearing for the United States was Robin Juni. Also before the Court for resolution without oral argument is the United States’ motion for a protective order in the Columbia River United case (Ct.Rec. 11). For the reasons…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Thomson v. GaskillSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Richard Augustine v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
- Voluntary Purchasing Groups, Inc. v. William K. Reilly, Administrator, United States Environmental Protection AgencyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1989
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Hanford Downwinders Coalition, Inc. v. DowdleCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- Pritikin v. Department Of EnergyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Hanford Downwinders Coalition, Inc. v. DowdleCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- United States v. Princeton Gamma-Tech, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
- Kenney v. Helix TCS, Inc.District Court, D. Colorado · 2018
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.