Legal Opinion

Universal Finance Corp. v. Schmid

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided March 5, 1955No. 39,473PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Smith, J.:

These were two actions on notes and to foreclose chattel mortgages on automobiles. Judgment was for defendant. Plaintiff has appealed.

The cases were consolidated in the trial court. They involve like facts and legal questions. The facts as to only one of them shall be stated.

After the formal allegations, the petition stated, The Chaney Motors, Inc. gave plaintiff its note for $2,421.25, and at the same time executed a mortgage on a described automobile, which was recorded in Reno county on December 12, 1952; that about December 26, 1952,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. General Motors Acceptance Corp. v. DavisSupreme Court of Kansas · 1950
  2. Sorensen v. PagenkopfSupreme Court of Kansas · 1940
  3. Trapani v. Universal Credit Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1940
  4. Rauh v. DumlerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1951
  5. Emerson-Brantingham Implement Co. v. FaulknerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1925

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Securities Acceptance Corporation v. PerkinsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1957
  2. Bordman Investment Co. v. FieldSupreme Court of Kansas · 1958
  3. Home Finance Corporation v. CoxSupreme Court of Kansas · 1962
  4. Fidelity State Bank v. La TempaMissouri Court of Appeals · 1961
  5. Interstate Finance Co. v. Kansas City Automobile Auction Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1969

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API