Sorensen v. Pagenkopf
Supreme Court of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Smith, J.:
This was an action to replevin a Ford automobile. Judgment was for the plaintiffs. Defendant appeals.
The petition alleged that plaintiffs were a copartnership and engaged in the business of financing the buying of automobiles; that about the 3d day of April, 1939, Alice M. Schaaf made her note in writing to the Lydick Motor Service, a copartnership composed of Paul Schimming and W. H. Schaaf; that this note was assigned to plaintiffs on April 4, 1939, and that plaintiffs were the-holders of it; that to secure payment on the note on April 3,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Gump Investment Co. v. JacksonSupreme Court of Virginia · 1925
- Morris v. Firemen's InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1926
- Guaranty Discount Corp. v. BowersIndiana Court of Appeals · 1927
- Trapani v. Universal Credit Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1940
- Emerson-Brantingham Implement Co. v. FaulknerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1925
3Cited by12 opinions
- General Motors Acceptance Corp. v. DavisSupreme Court of Kansas · 1950
- Price v. Universal CIT Credit CorporationArizona Supreme Court · 1967
- Sims v. SuggSupreme Court of Kansas · 1948
- Weaver v. Hartford Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1949
- Rauh v. DumlerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1951
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.