Legal Opinion
Bordman Investment Co. v. Field
Supreme Court of Kansas
Decided January 25, 1958No. 40,752PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Parker, C. J.:
Plaintiff, Bordman Investment Company, a corporation licensed under the laws of the State of Missouri to engage in the automobile finance business, commenced an ordinary replevin action against the defendants, Willis D. Field and Pauline V. Field, residents of Johnson County, Kansas, in the district court of Johnson County on March 13, 1956, by filing a petition wherein it alleged, in substance, that it had a special ownership or interest in and was entitled to the immediate possession of a 1956 Buick automobile (describing it) under and…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Wilson v. HolmSupreme Court of Kansas · 1948
- Modlin v. Consumers Cooperative Ass'n.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1952
- General Motors Acceptance Corp. v. DavisSupreme Court of Kansas · 1950
- Rodgers v. CrumSupreme Court of Kansas · 1950
- Nausley v. NausleySupreme Court of Kansas · 1957
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Bordman Investment Co. v. Peoples Bank of Kansas CityMissouri Court of Appeals · 1958
- Interstate Finance Co. v. Kansas City Automobile Auction Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1969
- Adams v. HeisenNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1967
- Bordman Investment Co. v. Peoples Bank of Kansas CityMissouri Court of Appeals · 1958
- Bordman Investment Co. v. Peoples Bank of Kansas CityMissouri Court of Appeals · 1958