People v. Bennetto
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
McCOMB, J.
Defendant was convicted of manufacturing, and possessing for sale, a restricted dangerous drug, in violation of former sections 11911 and 11912 (now §§ 11378-11379) of the Health and Safety Code. His principal contention on appeal is that the trial court erred in ruling at a pretrial suppression hearing (Pen. Code, § 1538.5) that the entry of police officers into his apartment did not violate section 844 of the Penal Code and that certain evidence seized in the apartment was therefore admissible against him. On the facts of this case, defendant’s contention must be sustained…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Harris v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Sabbath v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- People v. DumasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
- People v. MarshallCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
- Remers v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- People v. JacobsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1987
- State v. HarrisCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1975
- People v. BighamCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
- People v. Superior Court (Reilly)California Court of Appeal · 1975
- People v. VollheimCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.