Legal Opinion

Remers v. Superior Court

California Supreme Court

Decided June 16, 1970No. S. F. 22722PublishedCited by 127 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

PETERS, J.

Petitioner was charged with possession for sale of dangerous drugs. (Health & Saf. Code, § 11911.) After a hearing, the superior court denied petitioner’s motion to suppress the evidence of the pills (Pen. Code, § 1538.5), and we issued an alternative writ of mandate.

This case is controlled’by our decision in Cunha v. Superior Court, ante p. 352 [85 Cal.Rptr. 160, 466 P.2d 704], and accordingly we hold that the arresting officers did not have probable cause to arrest and search petitioner and that the evidence uncovered by the search is inadmissible.

At approximately 10:52…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. People v. LaraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
  3. Tompkins v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
  4. People v. MooreCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  5. People v. One 1960 Cadillac CoupeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by127 opinions

  1. People v. Lance W.California Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Fare v. Tony C.California Supreme Court · 1978
  3. People v. BowerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
  4. People v. BlockCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  5. People v. MartinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973

122 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API