Legal Opinion

People v. Bigham

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 12, 1975No. 25920PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

49 Cal.App.3d 73 (1975)

122 Cal. Rptr. 252

THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Appellant,

v.

NICKEY JAY BIGHAM et al., Defendants and Respondents.

Docket No. 25920.

Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division One.

June 12, 1975.

COUNSEL

Joseph P. Busch, District Attorney, Harry B. Sondheim and Sterling S. Suga, Deputy District Attorneys, for Plaintiff and Appellant.

Belger & Courtney and Laurie R. Belger for Defendant and Respondent McVoy.

No appearance for Defendant and Respondent Bigham.

OPINION

LILLIE, J.

Defendants were charged with possession for sale of marijuana (§ 11359, Health & Saf. Code).…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. United States v. VentrescaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  2. Harris v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. People v. LaraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
  4. People v. HillCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  5. Lorenzana v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. People v. MacKCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
  2. People v. LaJociesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1981
  3. People v. MatthewsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980
  4. People v. HustonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
  5. People v. BaldwinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API