Legal Opinion

State v. Battle

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided May 28, 1969No. 697SC159PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMorris, J.

Defendant brings forward several assignments of error, all of which we find to be without merit. The evidence taken in the light most favorable to the State, as we are required to do, State v. Bell, 270 N.C. 25, 153 S.E. 2d 741, was clearly sufficient to withstand a motion for nonsuit.

The defendant argues that the trial judge erred in allowing the solicitor to ask leading questions. “The allowance of leading questions is a matter entirely within the discretion of the trial judge, and his rulings will not be reviewed on appeal, at least in the absence of a showing of abuse of discretion.”…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. State v. BellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  2. State v. CaseSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
  3. State v. . PerrySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1946
  4. State v. PerrySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1946
  5. State v. RawleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. EvansCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979
  2. State v. ParkerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1976
  3. State v. BerryCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API