Legal Opinion
Hudson v. Joseph B. Fay Co.
District Court, D. Maryland
Decided October 12, 1995No. Civ. L-94-630PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
LEGG, District Judge.
Plaintiff brought this suit pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-2 ei seq. (“Title VII”) alleging that defendant, his former employer, discriminated against him on the basis of race and that this discrimination took the form of differential treatment and ultimately, his termination. Following discovery, defendant moved for summary judgment. Although the Court sent plaintiff a reminder that his response was overdue, Hudson did not op pose the motion. 1 While plaintiffs default is an independent ground for dismissing Hudson’s suit, the Court, nevertheless, will consider…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- St. Mary's Honor Center v. HicksSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Lujan v. National Wildlife FederationSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Donald R. MITCHELL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. DATA GENERAL CORPORATION, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1993
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Porter v. National Con-Serv, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 1998
- Carroll v. Town of University ParkDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1997
- Elries v. Denny's, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 2002
- Bishop v. Peppertree Resorts, Ltd.District Court, W.D. North Carolina · 2002
- Barski v. Cyberdata Technologies, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 2020