Legal Opinion

Schumacher v. Barker

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided May 20, 1997No. 71235PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CRANDALL, Judge.

Plaintiff, Bonnie Schumacher, appeals from the judgment of the trial court sustaining defendants’ motion for directed verdict on her action for personal injuries. We affirm as to defendants, Michael Barker and Connie Barker (“Barkers”), and reverse as to defendant, Dennis Gordon doing business as Gordon Construction (“Gordon”).

In reviewing a directed verdict granted for a defendant, an appellate court views the evidence and permissible inferences most favorably to the plaintiff, disregards contrary evidence and inferences and determines whether the plaintiff made a submissible…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Harris v. NiehausSupreme Court of Missouri · 1993
  2. Zueck v. Oppenheimer Gateway Properties, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1991
  3. Halmick v. SBC Corporate Services, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1992
  4. Singleton v. Charlebois Construction Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1985
  5. Head v. National Super Markets, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1995

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Intertel, Inc. v. Sedgwick Claims Management Services, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2006
  2. Lyn-Flex West, Inc. v. DieckhausMissouri Court of Appeals · 1999
  3. Ozark Employment Specialists, Inc. v. BeemanMissouri Court of Appeals · 2002
  4. Fidelity National Title Insurance Co. v. Tri-Lakes Title Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1998
  5. Thong v. My River Home Harbour, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1999

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API