State v. San Patricio Canning Co.
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.
This action was brought by the Attorney General, in behalf of the state of Texas and its game, fish, and oyster commissioner, against certain individuals doing business under the trade-name of the San Pa-tricio Canning Company, to recover an occupation, or license, tax, upon the theory that the defendant’s operations bring it within the classification of a “wholesale dealer” in shrimp, and is therefore subject to the tax prescribed in chapter 178 of the Acts of the Regular Session of the Thirty-Ninth Legislature (22 Gam. Laws, 441), or, in the alternative, by article 936 of the Penal Oode.…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Gould v. GouldSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
- State v. American Sugar Refining Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1902
- Commonwealth v. CampbellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1859
- In re I. Rheinstrom & Sons Co.District Court, E.D. Kentucky · 1913
- Phillips v. ByersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Case v. ChambersOregon Supreme Court · 1957
- Harrington v. CobbCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1944
- State v. HoggCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1932
- General Atlas Carbon Co. v. SheppardDistrict Court, W.D. Texas · 1940
- United States Securities and Exchange Commission v. Carebourn Capital, L.P.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2022
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.