Legal Opinion

Ross v. State

Supreme Court of Delaware

Decided May 9, 2007No. 133, 2006PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOLLAND, Justice,

for the majority:

This is an appeal from final judgments that were entered in a criminal proceeding, following a bench trial in the Superior Court. The defendant-appellant, Maurice D. Ross, was convicted of Trafficking Cocaine, Possession of Cocaine with Intent to Deliver and several other related drug felonies. Ross was sentenced to the minimum mandatory term of incarceration for two years, followed by probation.

In this direct appeal, the sole issue raised by Ross relates to the Superior Court’s decision to deny his motion to suppress evidence. Ross argues that his rights…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. California v. Hodari D.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
  3. Michigan v. ChesternutSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  4. Muehler v. MenaSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
  5. Jones v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1999

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Lopez-Vazquez v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2008
  2. Williams v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2008
  3. Jones v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2011
  4. State v. MeadesSupreme Court of Delaware · 2008
  5. Carello v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2017

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API