Legal Opinion

State v. Meades

Supreme Court of Delaware

Decided May 6, 2008No. 271, 2007PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BERGER, Justice:

In this appeal, the State seeks review of a Superior Court decision suppressing drug evidence. The trial court decided that the police violated the defendant’s Fourth Amendment rights because, when they detained the defendant, the police lacked a reasonable articulable suspicion that the defendant had committed, was committing, or was about to commit, a crime. The State contends that the defendant was not detained and that the police do not need to have any suspicion of criminal activity when they simply approach a person and ask some questions. Because this argument was not…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Jones v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1999
  3. Ross v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2007
  4. Miller v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2007

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Lopez-Vazquez v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2008
  2. Brown v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API