Legal Opinion

Bainbridge v. United States

District Court, W.D. Oklahoma

Decided August 28, 1931No. 3964PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VAUGHT, District Judge.

This case is submitted upon an agreed statement of facts which, together with the admitted statements in the brief of the defendant, are as follows:

The deceased and insured, Blaine G. Yeoman, enlisted in the military service on May 20, 1918, and was discharged on April 4, 1919, by reason of demobilization. While in service, the insured was granted a $10,000 war risk insurance policy in which he named as beneficiary his mother, Mrs. Emily Yeoman. The insured died on May 30, 1925, and the designated beneficiary, Mrs. Emily Yeoman, died on August 15, 1930. The plaintiff,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Meadows v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
  2. Sprencel v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1931
  3. Jordan v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1929
  4. United States v. VanceCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1931
  5. Crawford v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1930

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. United States v. EllisonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1935
  2. Paschall v. Memphis Light Gas & Water DivisionDistrict Court, W.D. Tennessee · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API