Legal Opinion

Madrid v. Spears

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided November 15, 1957No. Nos. 5604, 5605PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MURRAH, Circuit Judge.

Appellee, Spears, a nonresident of New Mexico, brought this diversity action to cancel a deed and quiet her title to an undivided one-half interest in 320 acres of land in New Mexico, on the grounds that her name to the deed was forged. The appellant Madrids, occupying claimants under the deed, denied the forgery, but pleaded alternatively that they had made valuable improvements in good faith under color of title, and that Spears was estopped by laches to assert her title. By responsive pleading, Spears admitted the valuable improvements for which the Madrids were…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Meyers v. CanuttSupreme Court of Iowa · 1951
  2. Greer v. Stanolind Oil & Gas Co. Stanolind Oil & Gas Co. v. GreerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1952
  3. Reimann Et Ux. v. Baum Et Ux.Utah Supreme Court · 1949

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Gonzales v. Oil, Chemical & Atomic Workers International UnionNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1966
  2. Sanguinetti v. StreckerNevada Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Cano v. LovatoNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1986
  4. Robertus v. CandeeMontana Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Washington v. ClaassenSupreme Court of Kansas · 1976

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API