Legal Opinion
Riordan v. City of Joliet
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided June 4, 1998No. 96 C 8400PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
SHADUR, Senior District Judge.
Daniel Riordan (“Riordan”) initially sued City of Joliet (“Joliet”), its Police Officers Joseph Seme (“Seme”) and Michael Knowski (“Knowski”) (collectively “Officers”) and private corporation Sports Center, Inc. (“Cen ter”) under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (“Section 1988”) and Illinois state law. This Court’s April 24, 1998 memorandum opinion and order dismissed Riordan’s state law claims against Joliet and Officers (Counts’ IV, V, VI and VII). Riordan has since dismissed his claims against Center. Riordan’s remaining Section 1983 claims charge…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Anderson v. CreightonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Board of the County Commissioners of Bryan County v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- James Gladden, Jr. v. Kenneth RichbourgCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2014
- William Anderson v. City of MinneapolisCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2019
- Anderson v. City of MinneapolisDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2018
- PUNSKY v. CITY OF PORTLANDDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2021
- Rangel v. SateleDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2025