Legal Opinion
Washington Tennis & Education Foundation, Inc. v. Clark Nexsen, Inc.
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided September 13, 2017No. Civil Action No. 2015-2254PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
Amit P. Mehta, United States District Judge
I. INTRODUCTION
This lawsuit arises but of a contract between Plaintiff Washington Tennis & Education Foundation, Inc., and Defendant Clark Nexsen, Inc., in which Defendant agreed to design and oversee construction of a $10 million tennis and education facility in southeast Washington, D.C. (“Architect Agreement”). A little more than a year after entering into the Architect Agreement, Plaintiff assigned “all of [its] right, title and interest” in the agreement to a related but separate entity, Washington Tennis & Education…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Bronner v. DugganCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2019
- Baltimore v. PruittCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2017
- Bronner v. DugganDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2019
- Colella v. AndrousDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2021
- In re Estate of MoteisouSupreme Court of The Commonwealth of The Northern Mariana Islands · 2023
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.