Legal Opinion

Hulsman v. Todd

California Supreme Court

Decided September 20, 1892No. 14568PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Lassen County. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

Belcher, C.

— It is alleged in the complaint in this case that for more than thirty years the plaintiff and *229his grantors have been the owners and in possession of a certain tract of land in Lassen County, which, during all that time, has been held and used by them as a farm; that from time immemorial a small stream of water, known as Lassen Creek, has flowed to, upon, and across the said tract; that in the spring the stream carries about 225 inches of water, measured under a four-inch pressure, but the amount thereafter diminishes until the flow does not exceed 25 inches; that plaintiff is the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Miller v. Highland Ditch Co.California Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Winslow v. GohransenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Blaisdell v. StephensNevada Supreme Court · 1879
  4. White v. LyonsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1871
  5. People ex rel. Love v. CenterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1885

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. City of Sapulpa v. YoungSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931
  2. Reios v. MardisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1912
  3. Ferry v. FiskCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921
  4. Mau v. StonerWyoming Supreme Court · 1906
  5. Creason v. CreasonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API