Legal Opinion
Trs. of Columbia Univ. in the City of N.Y. v. Symantec Corp.
District Court, E.D. Virginia
Decided July 2, 2019No. Civil Action No. 3:13cv808PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
On July 1, 2015, the PTAB construed the terms in the patent claims pursuant to their "broadest reasonable construction"18 and fully instituted inter partes review on all of Symantec's asserted grounds of invalidity.19 (Id. ) On June 30, 2016, the PTAB issued separate final written decisions-one as to the 115 Patent and one as to the 322 Patent. In these decisions, PTAB found that Symantec proved that certain claims of the 115 Patent and the 322 Patent could not be patented but failed to meet that standard as to other patent claims.20
D. The Second Federal Circuit Appeal: Inter Partes Review…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Pioneer Investment Services Co. v. Brunswick Associates Ltd. PartnershipSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- MARKMAN Et Al. v. WESTVIEW INSTRUMENTS, INC., Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Edward H. Phillips v. Awh Corporation, Hopeman Brothers, Inc., and Lofton Corporation, Defendants-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- IPA Technologies Inc. v. Microsoft CorporationDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 2024
- Ironburg Inventions Ltd. v. Valve CorporationDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2019
- Trustees of Columbia University in the City of New York v. Gen Digital Inc.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2019
- Trustees of Columbia University in the City of New York v. Gen Digital Inc.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2019