Legal Opinion

Ironburg Inventions Ltd. v. Valve Corporation

District Court, W.D. Washington

Decided November 8, 2019No. 2:17-cv-01182Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON 5 AT SEATTLE 6 IRONBURG INVENTIONS LTD., 7 Plaintiff, C17-1182 TSZ 8 v. ORDER 9 VALVE CORPORATION, 10 Defendant. 11 THIS MATTER comes before the Court on (i) plaintiff’s motion regarding inter 12 partes review estoppel, docket no. 260, and (ii) plaintiff’s motion for partial summary 13 judgment concerning inequitable conduct, docket no. 258. Having reviewed all papers 14 filed in support of, and in opposition to, the motions, the Court enters the following order. 15 Background 16 Plaintiff Ironburg Inventions Ltd.…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Therasense, Inc. v. Becton, Dickinson and Co.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2011
  4. TC Heartland LLC v. Kraft Foods Group Brands LLCSupreme Court of the United States · 2017
  5. SAS Institute Inc. v. IancuSupreme Court of the United States · 2018

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API