TWOGOOD v. State

OPINION

MANNHEIMER, Judge.

This appeal is a sequel to our decision in Twogood v. State, 196 P.3d 1109 (Alaska App. 2008). In that earlier decision, we resolved a dispute concerning the date on which Two-good became eligible to apply for discretionary parole, and we directed the superior court to amend Twogood's written judgement to reflect our ruling. In the current appeal, Twogood raises various challenges to the proceedings that occurred in the superior court following our earlier decision.

Underlying facts: the indictment, the plea bargain, and the first appeal

In 1999, Joshua S. Twogood was…