Legal Opinion

Encino State Bank v. Tenorio

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided March 15, 1922No. 2564PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OP THE COURT

DAVIS, J.

The primary dispute in this case is as to the ownership, or right of possession, of certain sheep and cattle. There are 111 assignments of error which cover a wide field. Obviously it is impossible in an opinion of reasonable length to discuss them severally, and no attempt will be made to do so. We will content ourselves with general statements of the principles by which the decision must be governed, and the assignments controlled.-

There is little controversy over the facts. Appellant, the Encino State Bank, claims that it had a valid mortgage on the animals,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Russell & Co. v. HarknessUtah Supreme Court · 1885
  2. Page v. JonesNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1920
  3. Milliken v. MartinezNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1916
  4. Roberts v. LubinNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1920
  5. Douthit v. NaborsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1901

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Cooper v. Albuquerque City CommissionNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Richins v. MayfieldNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1973
  3. Valley Utilities, Inc. v. O'HARENew Mexico Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Brunette v. Idaho Veneer CompanyIdaho Supreme Court · 1963
  5. Tom Fields, Ltd. v. TignerNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1956

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API