Jones v. . Hoggard
Supreme Court of North Carolina
This was a civil ACTION, tried at Spring Term, 1890, of Beetle Superior Court, before Armfield, J. The facts sufficiently appear in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Clark, J.:
The transcript of the record is defective in séveral particulars—
1. Though it appears that both plaintiff and defendant appealed, only one transcript is sent up — it does not appear which. Hence, the appeal cannot be determined. Perry v. Adams, 96 N. C., 347.
2. It does not “appear in the record, with reasonable certainty, that a Court was held by a Judge authorized by law to hold it, and at the time and place prescribed by law.” State v. Butts, 91 N. C., 524. There is in the transcript a copy of a conmission lo a Judge to hold a term of Bertie Court in lieu of the Judge regularly…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- State v. . ButtsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1884
- Perry v. . AdamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1887
- Jones v. Commissioners of FranklinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1883
- Rowland Bros. v. R. J. Mitchell & SonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1884
- Daniel v. . RogersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1886
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- State v. . StaffordSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1932
- Caudle v. . MorrisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1912
- Sanders v. . SandersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
- Schwarberg v. . HowardSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1929
- State v. . BostSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1899
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.