Legal Opinion
Koger v. Guarino
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided May 3, 1976No. Civ. A. 73-2365PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
BRODERICK, District Judge.
Presently before the Court is the motion of the plaintiffs for partial summary judgment and their motion for class certification under Rules 23(a) and 23(b)(2) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Plaintiffs Johnnie Mae Roger, Louis Steinbrecker, Anita Jackson, Amelle Douglas and Wanda Harrison filed this class action on behalf of a class ■ consisting of all customers of the Department of Water of the City of Philadelphia who have had their water service terminated or are threatened with termination of their water service without adequate due process…
2Cases cited43 opinions
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Wolff v. McDonnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Hazel Golden v. City of Columbus Cheryl Roberto, Director of Public Utilities for the City of ColumbusCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2005
- Ransom v. MarrazzoCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1988
- Ransom v. MarrazzoCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1988
- Geraldine Sterling v. Village of MaywoodCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1978
- Rupp v. Grantsville CityUtah Supreme Court · 1980
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.