Legal Opinion

Boston Retirement System v. Uber Technologies, Inc.

District Court, N.D. California

Decided April 16, 2024No. 3:19-cv-06361Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 BENJAMIN STIRRATT, et al., Case No. 19-cv-06361-RS (DMR) 8 Plaintiffs, ORDER ON JOINT DISCOVERY 9 v. LETTER AND RELATED SEALING MOTIONS 10 UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., et al., Re: Dkt. Nos. 394, 395, 419, 435 11 Defendants. 12 The parties filed a joint discovery letter in which Lead Plaintiff Boston Retirement System 13 (“BRS”) seeks to compel production of 12 documents listed on the privilege log of Defendant 14 Uber Technologies, Inc. (“Uber”) over which Uber asserts claims of attorney-client privilege (the 15 “Uber…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Upjohn Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  2. Center for Auto Safety v. Chrysler Group, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
  3. United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross-Appellant v. Curtis R. Martin, Jr., Defendant-Appellant-Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
  4. United States v. Raymond M. GrayCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
  5. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Tei Fu CHEN; The Sunrider Corporation, Defendants-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API