Doherty v. Holliday
Indiana Supreme Court
From the Montgomery Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtElliott, J.
The complaint sets forth several and distinct claims in favor of the plaintiffs respectively, as creditors of the firm of Fisher Doherty & Son.
After alleging that the firm is indebted to the plaintiffs severally, and stating the amount and character of the claims distributively, the complaint charges that a conspiracy was entered into between Fisher Doherty and Marshall D. Doherty, who composed the firm of Doherty & Son, with other of the defendants, to defraud existing and subsequent creditors.
It is also alleged, with particularity, that pursuant to the conspiracy the firm of Doherty & Son…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Johnson v. WatersSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- Murtha v. . CurleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1882
- Pendleton v. PerkinsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1872
- Phelps v. SmithIndiana Supreme Court · 1888
- Towns v. SmithIndiana Supreme Court · 1888
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Central Improvement Co. v. Cambria Steel Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1913
- Peru Heating Co. v. LenhartIndiana Court of Appeals · 1911
- Miller v. Jackson TownshipIndiana Supreme Court · 1912
- Armstrong v. DunnIndiana Supreme Court · 1895
- Baker v. State Bank of AkronIndiana Court of Appeals · 1942
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.