Legal Opinion
Fattore v. United States
United States Court of Claims
Decided February 6, 1963No. 96-61PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JONES, Chief Judge.
Plaintiffs sue to recover the expenses and damages incurred as a result of moving themselves and their possessions from land acquired from them by the United States. Their claim is brought pursuant to the provisions of section 401 (b) of the Act of July 14, 1952, 66 Stat. 624, hereinafter quoted, which allows the Secretary of any military department acquiring land for any public works project, in his discretion, to reimburse the owners and tenants thereof for the fair amount of the moving expenses incurred in connection with vacating such land.
The Fattore Company, a…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Soriano v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Martin v. MottSupreme Court of the United States · 1827
- United States v. BabcockSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
- Dismuke v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
- United States v. George S. Bush & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Nager Electric Company, Inc. And Keystone Engineering Corporation v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1966
- Baker v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1980
- Shull v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1981
- United States v. 422,978 Square Feet of Land, in the City and County of San Francisco, and Unknown Owners, State of California, AndCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1971
- Strategic Housing Finance Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2009
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.