Legal Opinion

Tadros v. Middlebury Medical Center, Inc.

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided April 22, 2003No. SC 16866PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

NORCOTT, J.

The dispositive issue in this appeal is whether the trial court properly concluded that a right of first refusal, reserved to the grantor in a certain contract for the sale of real property, applied within the context of a foreclosure sale. The defendant, Giuseppe Tripodi, appeals1 from the judgment of the trial court permitting the intervening defendant, Edgar C. Savarese, and his assignee, SNEMS, LLC (SNEMS), to exercise its right of first refusal to purchase certain real property on which Tripodi successfully had bid in a foreclosure sale. On appeal, Tripodi claims that…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Torres v. City of WaterburySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
  2. Draper v. GochmanTexas Supreme Court · 1966
  3. Hare v. McClellanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
  4. Henderson v. MillisSupreme Court of Iowa · 1985

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Bayer v. Showmotion, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
  2. Huntington National Bank v. CorneliusAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
  3. Longmoor v. NilsenDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2004
  4. Tadros v. TripodiConnecticut Appellate Court · 2005
  5. CitiMortgage, Inc. v. CominiSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2018

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API