Legal Opinion

Jarriel v. Savannah Guano Co.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided May 18, 1925No. 16018PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJenkins, P. J.

Testimony without probative value, even though admitted without objection, will not support or sustain a verdict. Roesel v. Green, 28 Ga. App. 694 (1) (113 S. E. 35). Mere hearsay is without probative value. Whittle v. Citizens Bank of Ashburn, 29 Ga. App. 308, 309 (114 S. E. 920); Rabun v. Commercial Nat. Bank, 21 Ga. App. 43 (93 S. E. 524). But “where, in a claim case, it was admitted the defendant in fi. fa. was in possession of the land levied on at the time of the levy, any declarations made by the defendant up to the time of the levy and while in possession were admissible in evidence.”…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Hannon v. . GrizzardSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1888
  2. Bull & Son v. CarpenterCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1924
  3. Rutledge v. HudsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1887
  4. Rabun v. Commercial National BankCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1917
  5. Smiley v. PadgettSupreme Court of Georgia · 1905

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Carter v. Marble Products Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1934
  2. Egli v. HuttonOregon Supreme Court · 1931
  3. Millsaps v. Strange Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1928
  4. Leachman v. MitchellCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API