Legal Opinion

Rabun v. Commercial National Bank

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided September 19, 1917No. 8373PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Complaint; from Calhoun superior court — Judge Cox. December 30, 1917.

1Opinion of the CourtJenkins, J.

1. A promissory note payable to the order of the maker and properly indorsed by him is a negotiable instrument, and the holder is presumed to be such bona fide and for value. Civil Code (1910), § 4288; Pryor v. American Trust & Banking Co., 15 Ga. App. 822 (84 S. E. 312); Wade v. Elliott, 11 Ga. App. 646 (75 S. E. 989); Rhodes v. Beall, 73 Ga. 641; Paris v. Moe, 60 Ga. 91; Bennett v. Gilmer, 15 Ga. App. 650 (84 S. E. 151). This presumption in favor of the holder of such an instrument is not overcome by proof made of the declarations of the payee thereof, whether made before or after its…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Eastlick v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1902
  2. Kemp v. Central of Georgia Railway Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1905
  3. Pryor v. American Trust & Banking Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1915
  4. Suttles v. SewellSupreme Court of Georgia · 1903
  5. Rhodes v. BeallSupreme Court of Georgia · 1884

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Federal Reserve Bank v. HaynieCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1933
  2. Jones v. LawmanCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1937
  3. Brooks v. PittsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1919
  4. Acme Fast Freight Inc. v. Southern Railway Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1942
  5. Carl S. Strickland Co. v. Union Banking Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1931

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API