Legal Opinion
Martinez v. Mukasey
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Decided March 11, 2008No. 06-60063PublishedCited by 109 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RHESA HAWKINS BARKSDALE, Circuit Judge:
After Jose Martinez was convicted of bank fraud, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1344, the United States sought to remove him, pursuant to § 237(a)(2)(A)(iii) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA), as amended by the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act of 1996 (IIRIRA). 8 U.S.C. § 1227(a)(2)(A)(Hi). Ruling the bank-fraud conviction constitutes an aggravated felony, the immigration judge (IJ) sustained the removability charge and denied Martinez statutory eligibility for a waiver of inadmissibility. Both on direct appeal and in…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Pioneer Investment Services Co. v. Brunswick Associates Ltd. PartnershipSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Taylor v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Cardoza-FonsecaSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Connecticut National Bank v. GermainSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by109 opinions
- United States v. RodriguezCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2010
- Hing Sum v. HolderCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- Texas Democratic Party v. Greg Abbott, GoveCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2020
- Hanif v. Attorney General of United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2012
- Adv Indicator v. Acadia InsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2022
104 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.