Legal Opinion

Freeling v. Tucker

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided June 10, 1930No. 5384PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBudge, J.

Respondent brought this action against appellant to recover a sum alleged to be due and unpaid for professional services and expenses incurred in connection therewith as attorney for appellant. On trial of the cause to court and jury, verdict and judgment were returned and entered in favor of respondent. This appeal is from the judgment.

Urged against respondent’s recovery in the trial court and the principal contention here is that respondent has not been admitted to practice law in this state and may not therefore maintain an action against appellant growing out of the rendition, to her of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Anderson v. CoolinIdaho Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Tuppela v. MathisonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1923

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Birbrower, Montalbano, Condon & Frank v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
  2. McKenzie v. BurrisSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1973
  3. Winer v. Jonal CorporationMontana Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Application of KaufmanIdaho Supreme Court · 1949
  5. In Re Contempt Proceeding of SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API