Legal Opinion

Anderson v. Coolin

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided May 20, 1915PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Motion to strike from all papers filed in a canse tbe name of an attorney not admitted by law to practice in tbis state; and to strike from tbe files in tbe ease a brief couched in language disrespectful to tbe court and court officers, and unbecoming an attorney, wbicb motion was sustained.

1Opinion of the Court

BUDGE, J.-

— W. B. Mitchell appeared in the district court

of the eighth judicial district as an attorney in the case wherein W. A. Anderson was plaintiff and Andrew Coolin, W. B. Mitchell, trustee, E. H. Berg, trustee, Charles W. Beardmore and Washington Trust Co., a corporation, were defendants. An appeal from the judgment in said cause is now pending in this court, in which the said W. B. Mitchell appears as attorney for the respondents, in whose behalf he prepared, filed and served upon counsel for the appellants a brief in said cause. On May 1st, 1915, counsel for appellant filed a motion…

2Cited by11 opinions

  1. McKenzie v. BurrisSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1973
  2. Bump v. District Court of Polk CountySupreme Court of Iowa · 1942
  3. Application of KaufmanIdaho Supreme Court · 1949
  4. In Re Contempt Proceeding of SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
  5. North Laramie Land Co. v. HoffmanWyoming Supreme Court · 1919

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API