State v. Comer
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
Hilton, Justice.
Defendant was found guilty of selling soft drinks without first procuring a license from the division of hotel inspection of the Minnesota department of health.
The pertinent facts have been stipulated. Defendant operates a gasoline filling station in Minneapolis. He sold soft drinks at his station for the accommodation of the public. He did not have a license to do so. The beverages were kept in a cooler from which the purchaser served himself by selecting the desired bottle. The buyer uncapped it and consumed the contents directly from the bottle. No drinking glasses or other…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Louisville Gas & Electric Co. v. ColemanSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
- Patsone v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- City of Danville v. Quaker Maid, Inc.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1925
- State ex rel. Hoffman v. JustusSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1904
3Cited by3 opinions
- George Benz Sons, Inc. v. EricsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1948
- Associated Food Services, Inc. v. Commissioner of TaxationSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1974
- George Benz Sons, Inc. v. EricsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1948